Skip to main content

What you will be able to do

  • By the end of this module, you will be able to define spiritual objectification in one plain sentence and give an ordinary example that has nothing to do with God.
  • By the end of this module, you will be able to name the six things people go to God for and explain the difference between wanting one from Him and wanting it instead of Him.
  • By the end of this module, you will be able to describe the six-stage road the book traces, in order, and say what makes each step an ordinary one.
  • By the end of this module, you will be able to distinguish remorse from repentance by naming the subject of each sentence.
Start here

The Prayer With Nine Meanings

A man sits in a parked car outside a building, praying about a decision, and he prays well. He is not bargaining. He lays the thing out — the numbers, the conversation in the kitchen on Sunday, the way his oldest looks at him lately — and asks for wisdom, and asks for a door to open or close, and asks God to use him, and means all of it. Then he waits in the quiet for about twenty minutes and nothing arrives, and he drives home with a feeling he does not have a word for.

Nothing in that prayer was wrong. Wisdom is exactly what a man in his position ought to ask for. What this module is about is not the quality of the prayer but a question underneath it that almost nobody has ever had separated out for them: the words use me have about nine meanings, and the difference between them can shape thirty years.

The words, in plain English
spiritual objectification
Relating to God mainly for what He gives rather than for who He is.
compression
Pressing a whole person down into the one part of them you actually use, and then relating to that part as though it were all of them.
the six things
The six goods people ordinarily go to God for — access, answers, protection, power, provision, and spiritual status — every one of which is a real good and none of which is wrong to want.
usefulness as identity
The point at which serving stops being something a person does and becomes something they are, so that nothing about it can be adjusted without something happening to them.
remorse and repentance
Remorse says I hate what this has cost me; repentance says I hate what I have become and what I have done.
Compressiona whole interiorrunning the whole timeon its own scheduleabout things that havenothing to do with youSQUEEZED DOWN TOthe calm onethe one part you usegeneral-purpose by designfillable by whoever is nearestA function is general-purpose. A person is not. That difference is the whole subject.
What compression throws away is the specific, unrepeatable texture of being them.
The teaching

Start with the thing that has to be established before anything else, because every later idea in this course is misread without it. Being used by God is a genuine good. It is not a beginner’s prayer that mature people grow out of, it is not naive, and the desire underneath it — to be given to something larger than your own life — is one of the better things a human being can want. The vocabulary is not a modern distortion of something purer. Paul writes to Timothy using the image of a household vessel and lands on the word useful, set apart and prepared for good work. So the argument ahead is not an argument against the prayer, and any sentence that seems to be making one should be read against this paragraph.

What the book examines is not the prayer but a road the wanting can quietly become. And the word quietly is carrying weight. Nobody has ever stood at the start of this road and chosen it. Every step on it was taken by somebody who loved God, and most of them were praying the whole way — not cynically, not as cover, but with a wet face and nothing held back. That is what makes the material worth twelve modules instead of a warning label. If the people on this road were frauds you could spot them at a distance. They are not frauds. They are ordinary believers, further along.

Now the term. Spiritual objectification is relating to God mainly for what He gives rather than for who He is. Here is the picture the book uses, and it is worth having before the God-sized version. Imagine a neighbor you have lived beside for twenty years. Every autumn you knock and borrow his ladder, and he is always glad to lend it, and he always asks how the family is, and you always say fine and take the ladder. Twenty years of that. You could describe the ladder in detail. You could not tell a stranger one thing about him. Nothing dishonest has passed between you, he has never once been unwilling, and if you moved away tomorrow what you would miss is the ladder.

That picture comes out of the earlier books in this series, which described the same operation between people and called it compression: a whole person pressed down into the one part of them we use. A woman who has cut your hair for six years, of whom you are genuinely fond, whose mother’s name you do not know. The reason compression usually corrects itself with people is that there is somebody standing there, fully assembled, who eventually says something that does not fit the compressed version — I had surgery in March — and the correction arrives from outside you because there is somebody outside you to send it.

God does not, as a rule, interrupt that way. He is not less real than the friend from choir, but He does not usually tap somebody on the shoulder in the middle of a transaction to point out that they have not asked Him anything in eleven months. Which means the compression can run for decades with nothing to stop it, and the person running it will experience those decades as faithfulness — because from the inside, faithfulness and a well-maintained supply arrangement feel remarkably similar. Both involve showing up. Both involve real feeling. Both involve prayer. That is not a reason to despair; it is the reason a book exists that looks at this on purpose.

So here is the inventory, and the naming is most of the work. When people go to God, they are mostly going for one of six things. Access: the ability to approach, the open line, the sense that we may come and will not be turned away. Answers: direction, wisdom, a next step, which door. Protection: safety for ourselves and for the people we would lie down in traffic for. Power: capacity to accomplish something we cannot accomplish alone. Provision: the rent, the treatment, the work, bread in the ordinary sense. Spiritual status: standing — the sense of being in good order with God, and, less often said out loud, of being seen by other people as being in good order with God.

Now notice what that list is. Every single item on it is a real good. Access is the achievement of the cross. Answers are promised to people who ask for wisdom. Protection is prayed for all over the Psalms by people God did not rebuke for praying it. Power is given, provision is commanded to be asked for daily, and the desire to be right with God is not vanity but the beginning of everything. This is not a list of sins. It is a list of gifts. The whole book turns on a single hinge laid across it: each of these becomes objectification at the point where it is wanted instead of Him rather than from Him.

Work that hinge on one example, slowly, because four words are doing all the labor. Wanting provision from God is faith — a person brings a real need to somebody real and asks. Wanting provision instead of God is a supply arrangement with a religious vocabulary: the need is brought, the request is made, the goods arrive, and the relationship is no different afterward than it was before. Both look identical from outside. Both often look identical from inside, which is the difficulty. The same test runs on answers: asking God for direction is obedience looking for its instructions; wanting direction instead of Him is consulting an oracle, and the Hebrew Bible has a great deal to say about people who consulted oracles, none of it warm.

The road has six stages and the first three are ordinary. One: the prayer is prayed sincerely, out of love, by somebody who wants their one life to count for something outside its own boundaries. A great many people stay here their whole lives and are frequently the best people you know. Two: the desire to be useful slowly becomes the shape of the whole relationship — availability becomes the offering, fruitfulness becomes the evidence, being used becomes the proof that things are well. Three: usefulness becomes identity, and the shift is grammatical and almost nobody notices it. I serve becomes I am the one who serves. God spoke to me about this becomes I am the one who hears. A thing you do can be paused or corrected or handed to somebody else. A thing you are cannot.

Here is a constructed case for stage two. Tavo is forty-one and runs a recovery group at a church of about four hundred. He came in sideways eleven years ago because he needed the room himself, and two years after that he was setting out the chairs, and four years after that he was leading it. He is very good at it. Somewhere in there the prayer changed — not the words, which are identical, but what the words were reaching for. At thirty he prayed use me and meant I am yours. At forty-one he prays it and means, without ever having decided to, keep me useful. He would not recognize that description, and he would be right that the group has real fruit in it and that he can name six men whose lives are different.

Stages four and five are where the road stops describing ordinary believers and starts describing harm, and the logic is airtight, which is the trouble with it. Four: identity becomes entitlement. If being the one who serves is not what I do but what I am, then anything threatening my usefulness threatens me — not my role, me — and at that point correction changes category. It stops being information and becomes an attack. Not because the person is arrogant; arrogance is not required. Because a person defending their existence and a person defending their position look identical from outside and feel entirely different from inside. Five: entitlement becomes license, and the reasoning is never said out loud — the work is important — after which the cost of the work to individual people becomes a rounding error nobody keeps a running total of.

The sixth stage is a single verse written in the eighth century BC by a man from a country town watching the capital city work, Micah 3:11. Read its two halves separately. The first half is an inventory of paid religion: three legitimate offices, all of them ordained, all now running on money, so that nobody can any longer tell whether they are being told a thing because it is true or because it pays — including the person saying it. The second half is the part that stops people. They have not left. There is no atheism in that verse and no cynicism; these men are leaning, which is a dependence word, and the sentence they say while leaning is a true one out of Israel’s own story. Everything transactional, the language perfectly intact, the confidence undimmed.

Then I said, “Hear now, O leaders of Jacob, you rulers of the house of Israel. Should you not know justice?”

Micah 3:1 · Berean Standard Bible
Worked through — I do, we do, you do

I do — watch the reasoning

Let me work the hinge on one of my own examples out loud. Take protection: for about a year I prayed most days about somebody’s safety. To test which side of the hinge it was on, I do not ask whether the prayer was sincere, because it was, and sincerity is not the test — everybody has it. I ask a narrower question: when the thing I was afraid of did not happen, what did I do next? What I actually did was stop praying about it, in the sense that the subject closed and nothing replaced it. That is not a verdict on me and it does not mean the year was wasted. It is one piece of information about which of the two arrangements I was running, and it took four seconds to find rather than a month of introspection.

We do — finish this one with me

Here is a partly worked case. A woman prays for four months about a job situation. She gets the job. Step one is done for you: this is provision, and provision is a real good that God tells people to ask for, so nothing is wrong yet. Your turn for step two. Ask what would have to be true for this to be provision from Him, and what would have to be true for it to be provision instead of Him — and notice that the answer is not in the size or the wording of the prayer. Write one sentence for each side. The book’s own version looks at the following weeks rather than at the request itself.

You do — on your own this week

Over the next week, pick one thing you have prayed about recently and put it under whichever of the six it belongs to. Some items sit under two; put them under both. Then write, in four words or fewer, what you would call the subject line of that prayer, the way you would head an email. That is the whole task. No interpretation, no explanation written next to it, and no conclusion drawn — the sorting is what the module asks for, and the noticing tends to arrive later on its own.

Practice
15 min

Sorting the Six

This takes about fifteen minutes. Below are six prayers, described plainly. Put each under one or more of the six things — access, answers, protection, power, provision, spiritual status — and then, for one of them, write a sentence on what the difference would look like between wanting that good from God and wanting it instead of Him.

10 min

The Road in Order

Ten minutes, from memory first and then checked against the module. Write the six stages of the road in order, one line each, and beside each one write what makes it an ordinary step rather than an obviously wrong one. The second column is the harder and more useful half.

10 min

Watching a Sentence

About two minutes a day for five days, and nothing is written in front of anybody. Listen for the sentence God has really been using me, or any version of it, wherever it turns up — in conversation, in a message, in your own head. Note only where you heard it and what else was in the sentence.

Check for understanding
The likeliest misreading

The likeliest misreading is that this module has quietly argued against wanting things from God, so that the mature version of prayer would be one with no requests in it. That is not the claim and the book says the opposite: all six are real goods, God instructed people to ask for daily bread, and a person praying about a scan or a rent payment is exactly where they ought to be. The hinge is not the asking. It is whether the good is wanted from Him or in place of Him.

Flashcards
Prompt

Click the card to turn it over.

Comprehension check

Ten questions on this module

These check whether the material landed. They ask about the concepts, never about your own relationships, and nothing you answer is recorded anywhere but this browser.

Which sentence best states what the book means by spiritual objectification?

Why: The definition is about the direction of a real relationship, not about belief or sincerity. The tempting wrong answer is hypocrisy, but the book is explicit that the people it describes are not pretending — they love God and are praying the whole way.

What does the book claim about the six things people go to God for?

Why: The list is presented as a list of gifts rather than a list of sins, with each item traced to something scripture treats as good. Reading it as a list of faults inverts the argument, since the book’s point is that objectification happens to good things rather than to bad ones.

In the neighbor-and-ladder picture, what is the point being made?

Why: Nothing dishonest happens in the picture and the neighbor is always glad to help, which is exactly why it works as an illustration. The answer about unwillingness misses the point, since the whole force of the example is that no one has done anything wrong.

Which pair of words marks the hinge the book’s argument turns on?

Why: Four words apart, and the difference is often invisible from outside and from inside. Sincerity is the tempting alternative, but the book states repeatedly that sincerity cannot be the test because everybody has it.

What happens at stage three of the six-stage road?

Why: Stage three is the move from I serve to I am the one who serves, which is why it changes what correction can do. The option about money belongs much later, at the far end of the road, and is not what stage three describes.

According to the module, why does correction start to feel like an attack at stage four?

Why: Once standing rests on usefulness, a threat to the usefulness registers as a threat to the self, and the book says plainly that arrogance is not required for this. Reading it as arrogance is the common misdiagnosis, and treating it that way makes the situation worse rather than better.

Which is the most accurate reading of the second half of Micah 3:11?

Why: The verse shows dependence language and a true sentence out of Israel’s own story, said by people who have not left. The option about secret abandonment is the intuitive one and it is exactly what the book says is not there — there is no atheism and no cynicism in the verse.

A learner says: “So the book is telling me to stop asking God for things.” What is wrong with that reading?

Why: The material is explicit that the outer court is not a lesser place and that God told people to ask for bread daily. The reading that only prayers for other people count is a common substitute error and appears nowhere in the argument.

How does the module distinguish remorse from repentance?

Why: One sentence has the speaker as the injured party and the other is aware that somebody else is bleeding, so the test is grammatical. Volume of pain is the tempting measure and it does not work: both hurt, and only one of them is going anywhere.

What does the book mean by saying that a person who recognizes this pattern in themselves has arrived in time?

Why: The claim is offered as a technical statement about timing rather than as reassurance: what is alarming is the inability to see it, not the seeing. The idea of a second chance imports a verdict the book refuses to hand anybody.
Closing

What this module claimed

The prayer is not the problem: being used by God is a real good, and the course never takes that back. What can grow inside it is a road of six stages nobody chose — a sincere prayer, then usefulness as the shape of the relationship, then usefulness as identity, then entitlement, then license, and finally a religion running perfectly with the relationship gone. Under the road sits a list of six real goods, and each becomes objectification only where it is wanted instead of Him rather than from Him. Sincerity is not the test, because everybody has it.

This weekOnce this week, spend ten minutes with God having said out loud at the start that you are not going to ask for anything during them. When a request arrives, and one will within about forty seconds, write it on a piece of paper and go back; the paper is not a graveyard and you can pray every item on it afterward.

Next: This module named the pattern; the next one asks why the pattern survives even after the barrier between God and people has been taken down, which turns out to be the difference between a door being open and a person having walked through it.

This module works through Chapter 1 of <em>Use Me</em>, “Use Me.”

Saved on this device

Program Clarity

GraceRoot courses are psychoeducational learning programs, not emergency care, legal advice, or a replacement for therapy. Certificates document GraceRoot completion. Court, employer, board, or continuing education acceptance should be confirmed before purchase unless a page states a specific approval.